On the Science of Changing Sex

The Silencing of the Transkids

Posted in Editorial, Transgender Youth by Kay Brown on January 6, 2018
transkids

Transkids after transition

The last few years has seen the issue of gender atypical and gender dysphoric children, often called ‘transkids’ come to the fore in the culture wars.  There are several sides that have argued various positions regarding their appropriate treatment and upbringing.  But what has largely been ignored in this recent series of largely uncivil… I can’t call them discussions… is the voices of transkids and former transkids, both persistors and desistors.  Yes, both have been silenced, their voices unwelcome… because on all sides of the great debate their voices undermine the real, but hidden, goals of the groups.

I will be writing a series of essays on this topic, in bite sized chunks.  This is the first.

First, I must lay out some background and assumptions.  First and foremost is that one cannot understand the current debate and how it has silenced actual transkids without understanding and accepting that there are two (and likely only two) etiologies for two completely separate “transgender spectrums”.  I’ve gone into great detail in my essays posted on this blog on this issue.  So, if you are unfamiliar, please read them.  You may start with my FAQ.  I also highly recommend reading the FAQ and essays found on the transkids.us website.  However, the Cliff Notes version is that most Male-To-Female transsexuals develop out of the autogynephilic cross-dressing population who do NOT experience or express gender atypicality as children or teens and only develop gender dysphoria as full adults.  They typically transition around age 30 and older.  It is these “older transitioners” who are doing most of the loud, angry, “transactivism” regarding transkids.  The reason that they do so was well articulated on the transkids.us website,

“… the most socially and economically advantaged sector of the transsexual population consisted of autogynephilic transsexuals and they found it psychologically and culturally advantageous to embrace an articulation of autogynephilia in terms of a concept of “gender identity” which maintained that one could have an internalized and hidden feminine “gender” while simultaneously living a seemingly normal social and sexual life as a man. Pragmatically, it was expedient to erase the distinctions between types of transsexuals. … given that the “transgender” community is controlled entirely by autogynephilic transsexuals who have a vested interest in this “gender identity.” model and the medical community of surgeons, endocrinologists, and gender therapists, is now tailor built around their needs, both are resistant to any acknowledgement of the {two type taxonomy} or the acknowledgement of homosexual transsexuality as a separate condition.  If {this} understanding of autogynephilia were accepted, it would undermine the “transgendered” community’s construction of gender identity which they view as a route to legitimacy and acceptance. If {transkids) were acknowledged {as a separate group} it would be even more damaging because it would reveal inconsistencies in autogynephilic {transwomen’s} personal narratives and the understanding of their own condition. Since their political and social identity is built around the notion that they were always really “female” because they “feel like women on the inside”, that transkids who present far more cross gender attributes pre-transition, and are more convincing as women post-transition, do not share their unique psychology, would undermine the credibility of the way they think about their own disorder.”

So, with this in mind, we can see that these older transitioning transwomen, who have no relation to transkids, seek to create the impression in the public mind that they would have been such transkids if only our society had been more accepting and willing to let them transition as children.  But this is a only wish fulfillment fantasy.  But understanding this, one can see why they so vehemently DEMAND that there is no such thing as a “desistor”.  There is one and only one kind of transsexual… and that transsexual always was and will forever remain a “woman inside” (or a “man inside” as the case requires).  There is no room for the messiness of real children.  There is certainly no room for acknowledging that their own identities as women didn’t fully develop until well into adulthood.  So, desistors are the worst… as they open the door to understanding that gender identities aren’t magically and forever fixed at birth.

Desistence is real.  Persistence is real.  Listen to both.

Further Reading:

“The Invisible Transsexual”

Transkids.us website

“Age of Innocence” Essay on the age of desistence of transkids.

 

Advertisements

Comments Off on The Silencing of the Transkids

%d bloggers like this: